A Level Law Eduqas

This subject is broken down into 47 topics in 7 modules:

  1. The Nature of Law and the English Legal System 14 topics
  2. Component 1: Section A 4 topics
  3. Component 1: Section B 4 topics
  4. Component 2: Section A 6 topics
  5. Component 2: Section B 6 topics
  6. Component 2: Section C 7 topics
  7. Component 2: Section D 6 topics
Study this subject in the Adapt App →
  • 7
    modules
  • 47
    topics
  • 19,929
    words of revision content
  • 2+
    hours of audio lessons

This page was last modified on 28 September 2024.

A preview of A Level Law Eduqas in the Adapt app

Adapt is a revision planning app with full content coverage and unlimited past paper questions for 1,200+ GCSE and A Level subjects.

Study this subject in the Adapt app →

Law

The Nature of Law and the English Legal System

Law and Society: Rule of Law

🤓 Study

📖 Quiz

Play audio lesson

Law and Society: Rule of Law

Introduction to Rule of Law

  • The rule of law is a fundamental principle that upholds the power of law in a society over anarchy or tyranny.
  • Concept brought into the limelight by the philosopher A.V. Dicey in his work 'Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution.'
  • It propagates that no one is above the law, a principle applied to every person, including those in power.

The Three Tenets of the Rule of Law by Dicey

  1. Supremacy of the law: Everyone, regardless of status or position, is subject to the nation's law and can be held accountable for their actions.
  2. Equality before law: Every individual is equal in the eyes of the law. It forbids any special privileges conferred upon particular individuals or groups, ensuring fairness and justice.
  3. Constitutional law is a product of individual rights: According to Dicey, the constitution doesn't grant rights but acknowledges the rights individuals inherently possess.

Criticisms of Dicey

  • Dicey's view is criticised for being too idealistic and ignoring the realities of unequal access to legal representation and differing treatment of people by the law.
  • He does not account for certain instances where the law itself is biased or discriminatory.

Modern Interpretations

  • Lord Bingham suggested eight principles for the Rule of Law, including legal certainty, accessible legal redress, and fair trial rights.
  • Other modern understandings uphold that the Rule of Law must also uphold the separation of powers, maintain a fair legal procedure, and strive for legal certainty.

Rule of Law in the UK

  • The UK does not have a codified constitution, but the principle of the rule of law is recognised in various legal texts and statutes.
  • Instruments like the Magna Carta (1215) and the Bill of Rights (1689) uphold the rule of law.
  • Modern examples include the Human Rights Act (1998) and Constitutional Reform Act (2005).
  • These laws, among others, demonstrate the incorporation of the rule of law principles into the UK's societal structure.
  • The UK judiciary is also seen as upholding the rule of law – judges make decisions based on legal principles, not personal beliefs or political pressures.

Controversial areas

  • Areas such as prerogative powers, the deployment of troops, anti-terrorism legislation, and the detention of suspects pose challenges to the rule of law.
  • The demonstrate the delicate balance needed between state security and individual rights.
  • Protests against perceived breaches of the rule of law and ongoing debates about its practice indicate its significance and the need for continued examination.

Course material for Law, module The Nature of Law and the English Legal System, topic Law and Society: Rule of Law

Law

Component 2: Section A

Law of Contract: Express and Implied Terms

🤓 Study

📖 Quiz

Play audio lesson

Law of Contract: Express and Implied Terms

Law of Contract: Express and Implied Terms

Express Terms

  • Express terms refer to the provisions that have been specifically mentioned and agreed upon by both parties during the formation of the contract.
  • These may be written they can be oral.
  • They are considered to be of primary importance in understanding obligations under the contract.
  • There are two main categories: conditions and warranties.
  • Conditions are integral to the contract. If they are breached, the wronged party can terminate the contract and seek damages.
  • Warranties are less significant contractual terms. Although a breach will warrant damages, it doesn't give the wronged party the right to terminate the contract.
  • An innominate term is a term that could be a condition or warranty depending on the nature of the breach.

Implied Terms

  • Implied terms aren't expressly stated by the parties but are nevertheless considered an integral part of the contract.
  • These are generally regarded by law or by the courts as essential for achieving the contract's intended purpose.
  • Implied terms can come from four key sources: statute, courts, custom and previous dealings.
  • Statute: These are terms implied by Acts of Parliament such as the Sale of Goods Act 1979.
  • Courts: These terms are sometimes imposed by courts in the interest of fairness, to reflect the intention of the parties, or to maintain market efficiency.
  • Custom: If it's common practice in a particular trade or location to include certain terms, they may be implied into the contract.
  • Previous dealings: If parties have contracted before, past terms and conditions could form implied terms in their current contract, especially if a consistent pattern of dealing exists.

Exclusion Clauses

  • Exclusion clauses or limitation clauses are terms in a contract which attempt to exclude or limit a party's liability for breach of contract or negligence.
  • For these clauses to be valid, they must be clearly written and reasonable.
  • The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 provides controls on the application of exclusion clauses, particularly in consumer contracts. For example, it's not possible to exclude liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.

Parol Evidence Rule

  • The parol evidence rule prevents parties from introducing evidence of prior agreements or terms allegedly agreed after the contract was formed, when those terms contradict what's in the written contract.
  • The rationale is that a final written contract should reflect the complete and final agreement between parties.
  • However, there are exceptions such as when it's necessary to clarify ambiguity, establish a collateral contract, or in cases of fraud or mistake.

Course material for Law, module Component 2: Section A, topic Law of Contract: Express and Implied Terms

Can I trust Adapt’s expertise?

Adapt is already used by over 600,000 students and trusted by over 3,000 schools. Our exam-specific content and assessments are meticulously crafted by expert teachers and examiners.

Find out more about the Adapt app →

Planner

An always up-to-date revision timetable.

A personalised, flexible revision timetable that stays up-to-date automatically.

Content

All the exam resources, in one place.

Over 20,000 topics broken down into manageable lessons with teacher-written, exam-specific lessons.

Assessment

Past-paper questions, with instant feedback.

Unlimited past paper questions with instant examiner feedback on how to improve.

Progress

Track progress, together.

Progress tracking to stay motivated, with real-time updates to the Parent Portal.

Download the app today to start revising for free.