A Level Critical Thinking OCR

This subject is broken down into 40 topics in 4 modules:

  1. Module: Understanding Argument Structure 10 topics
  2. Module: Evaluating Argument Credibility 10 topics
  3. Module: Challenges in Critical Reasoning 10 topics
  4. Module: Constructing Arguments 10 topics
Study this subject in the Adapt App →
  • 4
    modules
  • 40
    topics
  • 15,707
    words of revision content
  • 2+
    hours of audio lessons

This page was last modified on 28 September 2024.

A preview of A Level Critical Thinking OCR in the Adapt app

Adapt is a revision planning app with full content coverage and unlimited past paper questions for 1,200+ GCSE and A Level subjects.

Study this subject in the Adapt app →

Critical Thinking

Module: Understanding Argument Structure

Identifying claims, reasons, and conclusions

🤓 Study

📖 Quiz

Play audio lesson

Identifying claims, reasons, and conclusions

Understanding Argument Structure

Arguments play a critical role in reasoning. They present a set of claims and reasons that form the basis of concluding a line of thought.

Identifying Claims

  • A claim is a statement or assertion that is open to challenge. It's the point an arguer is trying to make.
  • A claim could be factual, value-oriented, or a policy recommendation. They essentially set the stage for the argument.
  • Look out for subjective statements or opinions and interpret them as potential claims.
  • Words like 'believe', 'should', 'ought to', 'must', etc., often precede claims.
  • Always look to differentiate claims from established facts.

Identifying Reasons

  • Reasons are statements provided to justify or back up a claim.
  • Main and supporting points in any argument are often reasons.
  • They sometimes begin with transitional words like because, since, for, in that, as shown by, and so on.
  • Reasons are necessary to draw a conclusion from a claim and often provide evidence towards the claim.

Identifying Conclusions

  • A conclusion is a claim that has been reached by a process of reasoning.
  • Remember, conclusions are usually the main point that the author wants to convince the reader of.
  • These can often be recognised by words like 'therefore', 'thus', 'hence', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'it follows that', and so on.
  • Conclusions may not always appear at the end of an argument. Sometimes, they are stated at the beginning or interspersed throughout the argument.
  • Be sure to differentiate between intermediate conclusions (support other conclusions) and main conclusions (aim of the argument).

Connecting Claims, Reasons, and Conclusions

  • An argument can be seen as a structure with claims supported by reasons, leading to a conclusion.
  • The authors often use indicators to help readers identify claims, reasons, and conclusions.
  • Note that not all statements in an argument will be a part of claims, reasons, or conclusions. Look out for evidence, examples, elaborations, clarifications, and other such elements.
  • Recognising the structure and flow of the argument is crucial to understanding the logic and criticism behind the argument.
  • Critical thinking involves not only identifying these elements but also examining the credibility and relevance of reasons and the soundness of the overall argument.

Course material for Critical Thinking, module Module: Understanding Argument Structure, topic Identifying claims, reasons, and conclusions

Critical Thinking

Module: Challenges in Critical Reasoning

Logical fallacies and their role in reasoning

🤓 Study

📖 Quiz

Play audio lesson

Logical fallacies and their role in reasoning

Introduction to Logical Fallacies

  • A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning. Fallacies are like tricks or illusions of thought that usually follow a pattern and are often very sneaky in their arguments.
  • Allowing logical fallacies in arguments leads to poor critical reasoning and weakens arguments.
  • Understanding logical fallacies helps improve the depth, strength, and clarity of arguments.
  • Logical fallacies occur in many aspects of life from politics, science, debates to everyday conversations.

Common Logical Fallacies

Ad Hominem

  • Ad hominem literally means 'against the man'. It is a fallacy that uses personal attacks instead of addressing the actual argument.
  • For example, saying "You can't trust John's argument on climate change, he's a terrible dresser".

Straw Man

  • Straw Man fallacy involves distorting, exaggerating, or misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack or refute.
  • For instance, if someone says, "I think we should give better study guides to students", a response like "We can't spoon-feed students, they should be self-reliant" is a straw man fallacy.

Red Herring

  • A red herring is a fallacy involving the introduction of a topic unrelated to the subject at hand to divert the argument's direction.
  • E.g., when discussing climate change, stating, "But the economy is doing so well right now," is a red herring.

Appeal to Authority

  • The appeal to authority fallacy involves using the opinion of an authority as the base of the argument, instead of using a valid reasoning or evidence.
  • For instance, "Celebrity X uses this skincare product, so it must be good".

False Dichotomy

  • Also known as black and white fallacy, false dichotomy involves presenting only two options or sides when more are available.
  • E.g., "If you aren't with us, you're against us".

Role of Logical Fallacies in Reasoning

  • Recognition of logical fallacies: Understanding of these fallacies allows for the identification and avoidance of weak arguments.
  • Application in real world conflicts: This knowledge can be utilised to dismantle unsound arguments in debates, meetings or during interactions.
  • Enhancement of critical analysis: Knowing these fallacies helps to build and defend stronger arguments, enhancing overall critical reasoning.
  • Without recognition of these fallacies, there is a tendency to accept false conclusions.
  • Recognising logical fallacies in arguments is key to refining one's understandings and enhancing decision-making capabilities.

Note: Always be on the look out for these fallacies and remember that being aware of them doesn't make one immune to falling for them. It's all part of the daily challenge in critical reasoning.

Course material for Critical Thinking, module Module: Challenges in Critical Reasoning, topic Logical fallacies and their role in reasoning

Can I trust Adapt’s expertise?

Adapt is already used by over 600,000 students and trusted by over 3,000 schools. Our exam-specific content and assessments are meticulously crafted by expert teachers and examiners.

Find out more about the Adapt app →

Planner

An always up-to-date revision timetable.

A personalised, flexible revision timetable that stays up-to-date automatically.

Content

All the exam resources, in one place.

Over 20,000 topics broken down into manageable lessons with teacher-written, exam-specific lessons.

Assessment

Past-paper questions, with instant feedback.

Unlimited past paper questions with instant examiner feedback on how to improve.

Progress

Track progress, together.

Progress tracking to stay motivated, with real-time updates to the Parent Portal.

Download the app today to start revising for free.