Higher Advanced RMPS SQA

This subject is broken down into 39 topics in 3 modules:

  1. Philosophy of Religion 12 topics
  2. Medical Ethics 15 topics
  3. Religious Experience 12 topics
Study this subject in the Adapt App →
  • 3
    modules
  • 39
    topics
  • 14,929
    words of revision content
  • 1+
    hours of audio lessons

This page was last modified on 28 September 2024.

A preview of Higher Advanced RMPS SQA in the Adapt app

Adapt is a revision planning app with full content coverage and unlimited past paper questions for 1,200+ GCSE and A Level subjects.

Study this subject in the Adapt app →

Advanced RMPS

Philosophy of Religion

Aquinas: Argument from Motion, Contingency, Causation

🤓 Study

📖 Quiz

Play audio lesson

Aquinas: Argument from Motion, Contingency, Causation

Aquinas' Cosmological Arguments

Argument from Motion

  • Thomas Aquinas created his Argument from Motion based on the observation that everything in the universe is in motion or changing states.

  • Aquinas argued that nothing can move without a mover. This initial mover, he reasoned, must be unmovable itself, or else it would require yet another mover.

  • He identified this unmovable mover as God.

  • Hence, God is the prime mover who set everything in the universe in motion.

Argument from Contingency

  • Aquinas' Argument from Contingency posits that things in the universe exist contingently, meaning they could not exist.

  • There must have been a time when no physical things existed, but, if that were true, then there would be nothing that could bring the currently existing contingent beings into existence.

  • Aquinas concluded that there must be a necessary being whose existence is not contingent on any other being or thing. This necessary being is identified as God.

  • Therefore, God must exist as the necessary being to bring contingent beings into existence.

Argument from Causation

  • The Argument from Causation is based on the principle that, in nature, things have a cause and effect.

  • Aquinas believed that nothing happens without being caused by something else. He argued that this could not go on ad infinitum, which means an uncaused causer or a first cause must exist.

  • He identified this first cause as God, making God the ultimate cause of everything that happens.

  • Without the existence of God as the first cause, the sequence of cause and effect in the universe would be infinite and unexplainable.

Key Points to Remember

  • The Arguments from Motion, Contingency, and Causation are part of Aquinas' Five Ways, which attempt to prove the existence of God.

  • Aquinas argued that behind the motion, contingency, and cause-effect phenomena experienced in the universe, there must be a prime mover, a necessary being, and a first cause, respectively. He identified all of these with God.

  • Aquinas' arguments are forms of cosmological arguments for the existence of God. They operate on the principle that the existence and nature of the universe imply the existence of a being who was the cause or explanation for the universe.

Course material for Advanced RMPS, module Philosophy of Religion, topic Aquinas: Argument from Motion, Contingency, Causation

Advanced RMPS

Medical Ethics

Organ Transplants: Religious Responses

🤓 Study

📖 Quiz

Play audio lesson

Organ Transplants: Religious Responses

Overview of Organ Transplants

  • Organ transplants involve the removal of a healthy organ from one person (donor) and its transfer into another person (recipient) who has a failing or damaged organ.
  • It's a lifesaving medical procedure but also a subject of ethical and religious debates due to concerns about the sanctity of life, consent, and the definition of death.
  • Many religions have nuanced views on organ transplantation, often highlighting the importance of balance between saving lives and respecting religious doctrines.

Christian Perspectives

  • Most Christian denominations support organ donation and transplantation due to the principle of agape, or love for neighbour.
  • Roman Catholicism teaches the perspective of 'the gift of life', where organ donation is seen as an altruistic act of charity and love.
  • Nonetheless, some Christians may oppose it on grounds that the body is a temple of the Holy Spirit and should not be desecrated.
  • The Christian prohibition against 'playing God' might also discourage some followers from supporting organ transplants.

Islamic Perspectives

  • In Islam, saving a life holds great importance (Qur'an 5:32), hence many Muslims are in favour of organ transplants.
  • However, there is a prevailing concern about maintaining the integrity and dignity of the human body both during life and after death.
  • Based on this perspective, some Muslims might reject organ donation due to the invasive nature of the procedure.
  • Sharia law also emphasises informed consent, prompting questions about organ donation from unconscious donors or those unable to give consent.

Hindu & Buddhist Perspectives

  • Hinduism does not prohibit organ donation, as it aligns with the concept of dharma (duty) to help others.
  • Reincarnation, a key belief in both Hinduism and Buddhism, might also influence views on organ transplants, as the body is seen as temporary and changing.
  • In Buddhism, acts of compassion and alleviating suffering are highly encouraged, making organ donation and transplantation ethically acceptable.
  • Nevertheless, concerns about the precise moment of death – given the importance of consciousness at the moment of death in Buddhism – might affect decisions about organ transplantation.

Assessment of Different Views

  • These religious responses to organ transplantation reflect the complexity of the issue.
  • Each viewpoint has to balance the priority of saving lives through medical procedures with the respect for religious doctrines and the sanctity of the human body.
  • Understanding these religious perspectives can help to facilitate respectful discussions about organ transplantation, while acknowledging cultural nuances and individual choices.

Course material for Advanced RMPS, module Medical Ethics, topic Organ Transplants: Religious Responses

Can I trust Adapt’s expertise?

Adapt is already used by over 600,000 students and trusted by over 3,000 schools. Our exam-specific content and assessments are meticulously crafted by expert teachers and examiners.

Find out more about the Adapt app →

Planner

An always up-to-date revision timetable.

A personalised, flexible revision timetable that stays up-to-date automatically.

Content

All the exam resources, in one place.

Over 20,000 topics broken down into manageable lessons with teacher-written, exam-specific lessons.

Assessment

Past-paper questions, with instant feedback.

Unlimited past paper questions with instant examiner feedback on how to improve.

Progress

Track progress, together.

Progress tracking to stay motivated, with real-time updates to the Parent Portal.

Download the app today to start revising for free.